A question
Sitting around, talking about Deep Throat led me to wonder... what would it take, with our current congress, to get George Bush impeached? I'm sure if he just started shooting people on the street, with clear video of it, there would be almost no avoiding it... but barring that, what would he have to do? What evidence would have to come to light in order for the Republican congress to actually pull the trigger and vote to have the man put on trial.
It sure as hell will take more than him getting a blowjob and lying about it.
It sure as hell will take more than him getting a blowjob and lying about it.
posted by Valatan @ 6:47 PM
4 Comments:
At 04 June, 2005 16:04,
L Boros said…
hi valatan,
lotta people having the same discussion. if you haven't already read these ---
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=426&row=0
http://archive.democrats.com/preview.cfm?term=Bush+Impeachment
http://www.americasdebate.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=9800
l boros
At 06 June, 2005 15:37,
Anonymous said…
I don't think it's so much what Dubya would have to do--he's already done plenty. What it would take would be someone with a conscience (or afraid of being a scapegoat) in his administration, ala John Dean, Daniel Ellsberg, or Bill Felt, to come forward with documents proving the lies he's foisted on the American people. Ya never know, but I don't see that happening any time soon. Too many of his stooges are leftovers from the Nixon years, and they obviously learned well how to squash or buy-out the weak links.
At 07 June, 2005 20:15,
Valatan said…
thanks for those links, lboros!
At 08 June, 2005 12:00,
Valatan said…
rr, what worries me the most is that there is already quite a lot of that info out there, in the form of the Downing street memo, the testimony of Richard Clarke and Paul O'Neil, and everyone seems to just push it aside
Post a Comment
<< Home